May 19, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
War’s Psychic Toll
By BOB HERBERT
I couldn’t have been less surprised to read last week that an American G.I. had been charged with gunning down five of his fellow service members in Iraq. The fact that this occurred at a mental health counseling center in the war zone just served to add an extra layer of poignancy and a chilling ironic element to the fundamental tragedy.
The psychic toll of this foolish and apparently endless war has been profound since day one. And the nation’s willful denial of that toll has been just as profound.
According to authorities, John Russell, a 44-year-old Army sergeant who had been recognized as deeply troubled and was on his third tour in Iraq, went into the counseling center on the afternoon of May 11 and opened fire — killing an Army officer, a Navy officer and three enlisted soldiers. The three enlistees were 19, 20 and 25 years old.
This is what happens in wars. Wars are about killing, and once the killing is unleashed it takes many, many forms. Which is why it’s so sick to fight unnecessary wars, and so immoral to send other people’s children off to wars — psychic as well as physical — from which one’s own children are carefully protected.
The fallout from the psychic stress of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has been vast, but there was no reason for its destructive effects to have surprised anyone. There was plenty of evidence that this would be an enormous problem. Speaking of Iraq back in 2004, Dr. Stephen C. Joseph, who had been an assistant secretary of defense during the Clinton administration, said, “I have a very strong sense that the mental health consequences are going to be the medical story of this war.”
I remember writing a column about Jeffrey Lucey, a 23-year-old Marine who was deeply depressed and suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, or P.T.S.D., when he returned from Iraq after serving in the earliest months of the war. He described gruesome events that he had encountered and was harshly critical of himself. He drank to excess, had nightmares, withdrew from friends and wrecked the family car.
On the afternoon of June 22, 2004, he wrote a note that said, “It’s 4:35 p.m. and I am near completing my death.” He then hanged himself with a garden hose in the basement of his parents’ home.
Because we have chosen not to share the sacrifices of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the terrible burden of these conflicts is being shouldered by an obscenely small portion of the population. Since this warrior class is so small, the same troops have to be sent into the war zones for tour after harrowing tour.
As the tours mount up, so do the mental health problems. Combat is crazy-making to start with. Multiple tours are recipes for complete meltdowns.
As the RAND Corporation reported in a study released last year:
“Not only is a higher proportion of the armed forces being deployed, but deployments have been longer, redeployment to combat has been common, and breaks between deployments have been infrequent.”
Recent attempts by the military to deal with some of the most egregious aspects of its deployment policies have amounted to much too little, much too late. The RAND study found that approximately 300,000 men and women who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan were already suffering from P.T.S.D. or major depression. That’s nearly one in every five returning veterans.
The mass-produced tragedies of war go far beyond combat deaths. Behind the abstract wall of RAND’s statistics is the immense real-life suffering of very real people. The toll includes the victims of violence and drunkenness and broken homes and suicides. Most of the stories never make their way into print. The public that professes such admiration and support for our fighting men and women are not interested.
Other studies have paralleled RAND’s in spotlighting the psychic toll of these wars. A CBS News survey found that veterans aged 20 to 24 were two to four times as likely to commit suicide as nonveterans the same age. A Time magazine cover story last year disclosed that “for the first time in history, a sizable and growing number of U.S. combat troops are taking daily doses of antidepressants to calm nerves strained by repeated and lengthy tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
We’re brutally and cold-bloodedly sacrificing the psychological well-being of these men and women, which should be a scandal. If these wars are so important to our national security, we should all be engaging in some form of serious sacrifice, and many more of us should be serving.
But the country soothes its conscience and tamps down its guilt with the cowardly invocation: “Oh, they’re volunteers. They knew what they were getting into.”
Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company
Hello, since torture has also been such an horrific part of this hell of a war, here's the latest from Talking Points Memo - a source I highly recommend.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/05/smoke_and_mirrors_ii.php?ref=fpblg
« Smoke and Mirrors | Talking Points Memo Home
Smoke and Mirrors, II
05.19.09 -- 12:41PM
By David Kurtz
It gets better (or worse). A former intelligence professional who has participated in congressional briefings tells TPMmuckraker that the term "enhanced interrogation techniques" or EITs -- which appears throughout those CIA documents about who in Congress was briefed starting in 2002 about which aspects of the Bush torture program -- didn't come in to use until 2006.
It's a crucial point, our Zack Roth reports:
That's not just an issue of semantics. The former intel professional said that by using the term in the recently compiled document, the CIA was being "disingenuous," trying to make it appear that the use of such techniques was part of a "formal and mechanical program." In fact, said the former intel pro, it wasn't until 2006 that -- amid growing concerns about the program among some in the Bush administration -- the EIT program was formalized, and the "enhanced interrogation techniques" were properly defined and given a name.
Panetta has offered to make available to Congress the underlying memos on which the documents he released were based. Obviously, we need to see those. But there's a whole lot more going on here. Nancy Pelosi is a collateral victim (although probably not an innocent one) of the CIA's effort to cover its aft, an effort that commenced years ago, well before Bush left office.
I totally agree with the main points of your article. I do think that the American people would care deeply about our soldiers in Iraq and those of every other war and conflict. The problem is that we aren't getting the information we need to form an intelligent opinion. It is amazing how much information is kept from us, even by the so called "liberal" media who is accused of being anti anything conservative or republican. We only found out about the deplorable hospital conditions of recovering military personnel when a well known correspondent was badly injured and started an investigation. We are a people being manipulated daily by our media and our government and most os us are either blissfully unaware of this or are in complete denial about it. And how do they do it? They keep us "Afaid", they keep us "In Debt", they keep us distracted and off balance with diets filled with sugar and carbs and they keep us "Entertained." Have you noticed that all of the most popular programs on televison are empty and mind numbing and all anyone seems to care about is who will be the next winner of "American Idol." As long as those in power remain successful with this strategy, the American public will continue to see with blinders on.
ReplyDeleteThanx for your response, Rev. Lynn! I have often felt as you do as far as all the distractions and empty TV entertainment.
ReplyDeleteHow do you suggest we cut through these distractions and manage to get back on balance enough to see, hear, read and find out what's really going on?
Do keep your comments coming!