Friday, January 16, 2009

(When) No News is Bad News: An Israeli Peace Community Speaks of Human Rights News Vs Israeli Propaganda

"...the most carefully documented reports inside Israel of what is and what isn’t actually happening have been those of the HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS. You can see a combined blog of these (ELEVEN) organizations at here

I was listening to the radio interview of two teens from the south of Israel, both of whom had been living under intolerable conditions for several weeks, caught in the crossfire of the adults.

“Oh my family never watches the foreign TV stations,” said one. “They’re not as accurate as the Israeli news.”

“My father forbids it,” said the other. “It could be demoralizing.”

Yes, indeed, it could be demoralizing. If you don’t watch the “foreign channels” – CNN, the BBC, or Sky News, let alone al-Jazeera – you don’t hear the (other) half of what is happening. You never heard, for example, that

* al-Quds Hospital in Gaza took a direct hit yesterday; or that
* UNRWA notified the IDF that a shell had struck their storage facility (food, medicine, and fuel), but that the IDF fired six more shells after that; or that

· Children were found cowering in their home near the dead bodies of their parents, probably for days, as ambulances could not reach them, despite strict international laws about the free movement of medical crews.

But Israelis hear only the Israeli news. So what does my neighbor say to me yesterday? “Israel has the most moral army in the world. What other army would drop leaflets warning civilians to leave so they won’t be hurt by shelling?”

Well, the answer is: many countries. It’s a common propaganda tool. Here’s an excerpt from a leaflet dropped by the US into Japan during World War II:

“The weapons used by the Japanese military authorities in order to extend this hopeless war will be completely destroyed by the US Air Force. However, bombs cannot see, so we do not know where they will land. As you know, we Americans are a humanitarian people and we do not want to injure innocent people. Therefore, please evacuate these cities.” here

And here’s an excerpt of one dropped by Israel into Gaza a few days ago:

"As a result of the acts undertaken by terrorists in your area against Israel, the IDF is forced to respond immediately and take action in this area. For your own safety, you are asked to leave the area immediately." here

Needless to say, there is nowhere to go. Gaza is a tiny area – 10% the size of Rhode Island – densely occupied, and all the borders are sealed shut.

But Israelis are still repeating the mantra that turns my stomach: The IDF is the most moral army in the world.

Throughout these horrific weeks, the most carefully documented reports inside Israel of what is and what isn’t actually happening have been those of the human right organizations. You can see a combined blog of these organizations at here . You know there have been serious human rights abuses when eleven organizations come together to do something. B’Tselem even took the unprecedented step of issuing a call for a cease fire [ here ]. All have done important work in getting the message out to Israelis.

Last but not least, the peace organizations continue raising their brave and lonely voices to the ongoing vilification of patriotic passersby and motorists. Here’s what I wrote on my sign yesterday: “We have become our own worst nightmare.” Most passersby didn’t get it.

Gila Svirsky

Jerusalem

Co-chair, B’Tselem

here

here

1 comment:

CN said...

Khurram Ali Shafique has left a new comment on your post "Israel's Looming Catastrophe" (and I, Connie, am re-posting here for this discussion. Thank you, Mr. Shafique)

I understand that Israel is a touchy subject in the West, and therefore I avoid making comments lest I be misunderstood, and as a historian I think the basic handicap of Israel is that ultimately it claims its legitimacy on a colonial precedent, i.e. the Balfour Declaration (that was the argument popularized even by Eleanor Roosevelt during her extensive visits around the world). A colonial precedent in a post-colonial world is an anomaly. I am not suggesting outrightly that Israel is illegitimate, but the case which it has been presenting so far is illegitimate by the standards embraced by the rest of the world, including even the dictatorships, after the Second World War. Maybe Israel has got some better argument, and if so, then it would be in the best interest of everyone to put it forward.